Monsters University

All topics relating to Disney-branded content.
Post Reply
User avatar
mtndewtop
Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 7:09 pm
Location: Seattle Wa

Monsters Inc. 2?

Post by mtndewtop »

This is just a general question to all Disney and Pixar film buffs. Has anyone heard or has a web link for info on a Monsters Inc 2.
User avatar
indianajdp
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1813
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 7:10 pm
Location: Central Hoosierland

Re: Monsters Inc. 2?

Post by indianajdp »

mtndewtop wrote:This is just a general question to all Disney and Pixar film buffs. Has anyone heard or has a web link for info on a Monsters Inc 2.
Welcome to the forums, Dew.
As far as I have heard/read, Pixar is contractually obligated to do two more films (The Incredibles-2004 and Cars-2005) and I doubt very much that they would also be taking the time to develop a sequel to Monster's Inc. Especially since sequels do not count towards their contractual fulfillment.

I would also assume that any animated sequel done by Disney would be, ummm, less-than-successful.
" There's no Dumbass Vaccine " - Jimmy Buffett
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

I know that Disney can make a Toy Story sequel by themselves because they have rights to the characters, but Monsters Inc. was released as part of the 50/50 deal between them. Like Indy says though, if Disney were to do it on their own, the results would probably be disastrous.

Not to mention that MI has a great ending that cries out for NOT having a sequel.

Let me echo the hoosier's welcome to you. :wave:
Uncle Remus
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:24 am
Location: In the South.

Post by Uncle Remus »

How about a prequel? :lol:

yeah i know its stupid but it could tell how Mike and Sully first got their jobs at Monsters Inc.
jabroni76
Special Edition
Posts: 882
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2003 3:18 pm

Post by jabroni76 »

Well, I thought I read once that Pixar was thinking of a sequel to both Monster's Inc. and Toy Story. However, they stated they wouldn't do anything untill they had a story just as good, if not better than the original, which then will take more time... assumably.
User avatar
Luke
Site Admin
Posts: 10037
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: Dinosaur World
Contact:

Post by Luke »

Uncle Remus wrote:How about a prequel? :lol:

yeah i know its stupid but it could tell how Mike and Sully first got their jobs at Monsters Inc.
I think it's less stupid than a sequel, since the film kind of lends itself to a backstory. Still, I'd rather not see one.
User avatar
indianajdp
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1813
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 7:10 pm
Location: Central Hoosierland

Post by indianajdp »

I'd rather not see one either.
The original was fantasic and that's all I need 8)
" There's no Dumbass Vaccine " - Jimmy Buffett
User avatar
IggieKuzco
Special Edition
Posts: 729
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 6:04 am
Location: Wonderland
Contact:

Post by IggieKuzco »

I'd rather not see one either.
The original was fantasic and that's all I need
Well put indiana :D
55 days 'till Jack is back

They do say, Mrs M, that verbal insults hurt more than physical pain. They are, of course, wrong, as you will soon discover when I stick this toasting fork into your head. - Blackadder the Third
User avatar
DisneyLover27
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: Avondale, Arizona
Contact:

Monsters University

Post by DisneyLover27 »

Hey all, I think I found the reason why Disney has pushed back Monsters Inc.

http://www.firstshowing.net/2009/02/27/ ... ers-inc-2/
yukitora
Special Edition
Posts: 947
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:01 am
Location: at home apparently
Contact:

Post by yukitora »

That link doesn't seem to offer any articles for me, but it seems like Pete Docter really was hinting on a sequel. I hope so!
Mickeyfan1990
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2559
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 12:24 pm

Post by Mickeyfan1990 »

http://forums.toonzone.net/showthread.p ... 578&page=2

Read post #32 and you'll see that the rumour was a lie.
User avatar
tlc38tlc38
Special Edition
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:14 am

Post by tlc38tlc38 »

Must Disney ALWAYS ruin a good thing by making a second rate sequel?
Walmart: the perfect place to shop for a headache at a discount price.
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

tlc38tlc38 wrote:Must Disney ALWAYS ruin a good thing by making a second rate sequel?
According to the post above yours, Monsters Inc. 2 is just a rumor.

By the way, Pixar did make a good sequel with Toy Story 2. As fas as I'm concerned, that was on par with the original film. After that one, I'd say Monsters Inc. was Pixar's finest film. So if they could pull of a sequel as good as Toy Story's, I'd like to see it.
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

I think Pixar's proven they can do good sequels.
Anyway, I doubt Disney would be holding the BLu-ray off for another 4 years, even though they held off the LaS:SE DVD. I'm certain the blu-ray was just to coincide with the blu release of "Up", just as "Cars" and "Pixar Short Films" were released day and date with "Ratatouille".

Either way, I like the sound of a "Monsters, 2"! :)
Image
User avatar
Kyle
Platinum Edition
Posts: 3323
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:47 pm

Post by Kyle »

They cite blusky disney http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2009/ ... dered.html who Ive been told has been reliable in the past for having inside info. (Ive yet to see any clear examples though...)
User avatar
ajmrowland
Signature Collection
Posts: 8177
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:19 pm
Location: Appleton, WI

Post by ajmrowland »

The other thread on this site has updated info. Monsters is moved to a November blu-ray release.
Image
User avatar
magicalwands
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2099
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:24 am
Location: Gusteau's Restaurant

Post by magicalwands »

My opinion on this is: Monsters Inc is BETTER as a STAND ALONE film no matter how good the second one is. It ended well with us wanting to see Boo for one last time. Making a sequel would ruin the feeling.
Image
User avatar
blackcauldron85
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 16480
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 7:54 am
Gender: Female
Contact:

Post by blackcauldron85 »

Take it with a grain of salt, but:

Disney/Pixar Reportedly Confirm 'Monsters, Inc.' Sequel

http://www.mickeynews.com/News/DisplayP ... 99Monsters
Image
Mickeyfan1990
Collector's Edition
Posts: 2559
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 12:24 pm

Post by Mickeyfan1990 »

Yeah...I don't know how I should feel. But knowing Pixar, I'm sure they'll think of something.
User avatar
UmbrellaFish
Signature Collection
Posts: 5192
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:09 pm
Gender: Male (He/Him)

Post by UmbrellaFish »

I'm so-so about this news. MI is m absolute favorite Pixar movie, so I hope a sequel can do justice. Then again, this is Pixar, so hopefully it'll be even better than the original.
Post Reply