Does anyone wonder what the director of
Beauty and the Beast thought of the 2017 live-action film?! Well, here I come in like an enchantress to tell you!!!
I found this site that discusses costumes in film. They have an article called "Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?". You can read it
here. Now, honestly, even though they do a very extensive critique, I don't feel like they got to the plain reason it looks bad. I think it looks bad only because it the overskirts look like limp rectangles hanging off it. And sometimes I think the dress looks nice, particularly in motion and the back is personally gorgeous to me. I think it's like a neat modernization of a retroussée dress (I incorrectly thought the term was polonaise). But there's too many times the dress looks plain or ugly too me. To be honest, maybe if the dress did look a little more retroussée it would be better.
Anyway, here's what director Gary Trousdale said on the site:
Quote:
Gary Trousdale
It's gratifying that the 1991 toon was so well liked and such a hard act to follow. Honestly, we weren't trying to consciously craft a "masterpiece"...we only wanted to make a movie that people would enjoy and would stand with the great Disney classics of the past without being embarrassed. I have to cut the live action crew some slack...I think they did a damn fine job. if it were me doing the 2017 version, I might have made some different choices, but I think they did good.
-Gary Trousdale
Director, Beauty and the Beast 1991