Disney's Divinity wrote:JeanGreyForever wrote:
You automatically assume the worst
Yes, I do, and for good reason.
That's called a self-fulfilling prophecy dear. I would look it up if I were you because you seem to fulfill it every day or so.
Disney's Divinity wrote:JeanGreyForever wrote:Just look at the OUAT thread. I'm not a fan of the new season either, but you seemed to have formed your opinion entirely on the basis that they're using Cinderella's live-action dress.
I believe the real reason I skipped it was because Zelena and Emma were no longer a part of the storyline, and even Regina has become a background character. The fact that a cheap knockoff of Cinderella 2015 took over the show was just icing on that crap cake.
As pointed out to you various times, the only thing OUAT took from the 2015 Cinderella film was the dress. The fact that you have to label it as "Cinderella 2015" admits your bias. You could have just said Cinderella because the season has taken more from the original film than anything from the live-action film, except for, as I said, the dress. Personally, I think your real hatred for the film is really just the dress and anything else you claim is just in order to cover that pitiful fact up. And yes, I called that a fact.
Disney's Divinity wrote:JeanGreyForever wrote:
Um, let's correct this statement.
I don't think you have it in you to correct anyone.
Well, I just did and I have done so over and over. Look for the Cinderella Best Costume Oscar nomination as part of Exhibit A in the Museum that is your various mistakes and countless erroneous statements and beliefs.
Disney's Divinity wrote:JeanGreyForever wrote:Literally the posts before that are just us ragging on Belle's dress again, but Cinderella isn't even mentioned or alluded to.
You're right, I was being passive-aggressive to the trolls. Which I didn't feel sorry for then and I definitely don't feel sorry for now.
No, once more the troll has sadly proven to be you. Cinderella doesn't even come up half the time, but you're so paranoid and deluded that it will, that you have to bring it up first as if that somehow proves a point. As if that if you bring it up first by criticizing it, somehow that will spell a defeat for the film and its fans. Whereas, if God forbid somebody mention it with a completely neutral statement, somehow that will be a defeat for you. Well, I'll always be here to defeat you. That's the way it goes with the wicked.
Disney's Divinity wrote:JeanGreyForever wrote:It's debatable who's right or not, but BATB was far more mixed.
It's not debatable when Metacritic has scored them only one point apart. That's a fact as you like to harp on (unlike you're personal opinion of a dress--which, again, is not a fact, just so you know).
Metacritic, as I pointed out before, is one of various critics. There's IMDB, there's Rotten Tomatoes, there's newspaper journals and editorials, not mention independent bloggers. You like to pick and choose what reflects best on you but sadly the world doesn't work that way. People will not turn a blind eye to what you choose to negate. That would imply that you have some importance in the world.
Disney's Divinity wrote:JeanGreyForever wrote:In order for you to keep your praise, I'll pretend that you didn't mention it so many other times in the same post, because I think you really need this little bit of commendation.
You can save your breath. I don't want anything from you. I wish I could find a Golden Girls .gif of Blanche's "Eat dirt and die trash" for this moment.
I say this "discussion," if it can even be called that (more like a farce) is clearly over. However, I do have a parting gift for you and I'll do you one better and provide a version with audio so the message can really sink in.
[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXvSdnx_7RA[/youtube]