Yet Another Religion Thread

Any topic that doesn't fit elsewhere.
Post Reply
User avatar
Dr Frankenollie
In The Vaults
Posts: 2704
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:19 am

Yet Another Religion Thread

Post by Dr Frankenollie »

It's been a month since "Another Religion Thread" was locked, so CJ has given me permission to start another one. :party:

Disney Duster, I quite recently discovered that you'd posted a long reply to several members (including me) within a religion thread in Heartless' Disney Mania forum, so I assume you'll paste that post here instead (because nobody is on Disney Mania anymore).
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5166
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

I'm a buddhist.
Lazario
Suspended
Posts: 8296
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:35 am
Location: Shock and Awe Gender: Freakazoid

Re: Yet Another Religion Thread

Post by Lazario »

Dr Frankenollie wrote:It's been a month since "Another Religion Thread" was locked, so CJ has given me permission to start another one. :party:
REALLY?! Now, that's a shocker.

But... I kinda think the Abortion thread is going pretty well. I think whatever trouble plagued the last one- it's subsided now. I have faith Image that this could work out.
Image
4 Disney Atmosphere Images
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

PatrickvD wrote:I'm a buddhist.
Do you know kung fu?

Are you a Shaolin Monk?
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
PatrickvD
Signature Collection
Posts: 5166
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:34 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by PatrickvD »

Super Aurora wrote:
PatrickvD wrote:I'm a buddhist.
Do you know kung fu?

Are you a Shaolin Monk?
Neither. I'm more of a "Hollywood Buddhist". You know, you say you are one because it makes you an impartial douchebag that doesn't offend either side of the coin. :lol:

In all seriousness, I think Buddhism kinda kicks ass. Those Shaolin Monks are crazay.
User avatar
Linden
Special Edition
Posts: 672
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:24 am
Location: United States Gender: Female

Post by Linden »

Do we just discuss religion on this thread? State our religion?
I'm a Christian (Protestant, nondenominational).
Lazario
Suspended
Posts: 8296
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:35 am
Location: Shock and Awe Gender: Freakazoid

Post by Lazario »

You can talk about whatever you want.

I think Freedom should become a religion, since I believe in it and so many other people do not. And it should also become the official religion of the United States. Freedom is the way everything should be- you make your own choices for yourself and are careful not to impinge upon others' safety. And no one has the right to take them away. That way, legally, no one could compare abortion or gay rights to murder or rape. Because murder and rape would be clearly defined as physical violation whereas being gay has no physical effect on another person and pregnancy takes place entirely inside a woman's body. Also, when all the God talk was removed from the lawmaking and governing systems, people would be free from persecution because of religious superiority games. All religions would be viewed equally in the eyes of the law. So, Christians would have protection from hate with the exact same amount of force that gay rights received protection. Try to balance those two out a little.

The way things are now isn't working. Way too many religious people get the message that their rights are more important to be protected than the rights of gay people. Or women. And, can this possibly be put anymore simply: if you're not gay, don't marry a man. If you disagree with abortion, don't have one. Human rights, of which religion is one just like feminism and gay rights are, are about equality. You have no right to control others. Not where it counts. And if there is a God, he/she/it/they will surely see that. So you'd better hope they really don't judge- that instead they just let everyone into Heaven.
Image
4 Disney Atmosphere Images
User avatar
Dr Frankenollie
In The Vaults
Posts: 2704
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:19 am

Post by Dr Frankenollie »

Linden wrote:Do we just discuss religion on this thread? State our religion?
Yes, but I was hoping to continue a religious debate with Disney Duster...
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

I worship at the altar of Dylan. :wink:
User avatar
candydog
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by candydog »

I'm not religious at all. I respect that other people are but it's just not for me. I was born and raised Catholic, but never agreed with it really. I haven't been to church in years and would like to officially defect from the church, however the rules have changed somewhat in the last few years preventing people from doing this. I think that it is wrong to force people to remain registered as part of a religion that they no longer believe in, but then I guess I don't make the rules.
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

candydog wrote:I'm not religious at all. I respect that other people are but it's just not for me. I was born and raised Catholic, but never agreed with it really. I haven't been to church in years and would like to officially defect from the church, however the rules have changed somewhat in the last few years preventing people from doing this. I think that it is wrong to force people to remain registered as part of a religion that they no longer believe in, but then I guess I don't make the rules.
I never about this being registered as a certain religion. What kind of bullshit is this? I need to somehow find way ask for defection.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
Elladorine
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 1:02 pm
Location: SouthernCaliforniaLiscious SunnyWingadocious
Contact:

Post by Elladorine »

Image
User avatar
Super Aurora
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4835
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:59 am

Post by Super Aurora »

If got that letter I would go up to the pastor and spit on the letter in from of him and then burned it. then laugh at his face as i'm leaving.











I don't recall protestants doing that excommunication. I thought that that's all catholic shit, hell one of reasons Martin Luther rebelled from the Church is because of that excommunication crap.
<i>Please limit signatures to 100 pixels high and 500 pixels wide</i>
http://i1338.photobucket.com/albums/o68 ... ecf3d2.gif
User avatar
phan258
Gold Classic Collection
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:28 pm

Post by phan258 »

I'm another one who was raised Catholic, got old enough to start questioning things, and dropped it. I'm the only Atheist in my family, which makes holiday gatherings a little awkward sometimes, haha!

I am genuinely scared that someday I'll meet the man of my dreams only to find he's devoutly religious. I refuse to raise my children in the same brainwashing environment I was raised in....although if, later in life, they want to study religions and decide to subscribe to one, I won't stop them. I want them to have a choice---when I was little, there was never any implication or inkling of choice. You were what you were, and everyone else was wrong & hell-bound.

I still remember how heartbroken I was when the priest at my ex-church denounced Harry Potter & told parents not to let their children read it--I cried the whole way home, even though my parents never attempted to stop me from reading the series. But still! It frightens me that anyone would find those books threatening because they promote evil or whatever :roll:
<a href="http://s1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... t=sig2.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1116.photobucket.com/albums/k56 ... 8/sig2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
User avatar
Scarred4life
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1410
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2009 12:18 pm

Post by Scarred4life »

I was raised Catholic, but as I got older and my parents started becoming more religious, I became less. Now I just don't believe in religion, but if you like to classify things, I guess I would be agnostic.
User avatar
littlefuzzy
Anniversary Edition
Posts: 1700
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 6:36 pm

Post by littlefuzzy »

I'm guessing that letter is a hoax, put out to troll people.

Although, reading through the comments, it looks like the mentioned pastor has been thrown out of certain branches, so maybe he's just a complete wack job.
User avatar
Disney Duster
Ultimate Collector's Edition
Posts: 13334
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:02 am
Gender: Male
Location: America

Post by Disney Duster »

Sounds like so many of you left rleligion just because you had bad experiences with people using the religion wrongly around you...

Anyway...here goes...
Super Aurora wrote:So as we left off, Frankenollie, Goliath, Heartless, and I have been trying to explain how Abrahamic religions was founded and how it wasn't much different from any of the ancient religion. There's a lot of history involved in creation of how a religion is formed and spread.

Tell us your views, any views, related to any religion. Buddhism, Shinto, Judaism, Hinduism, etc
Super Aurora wrote:Anyway, To continue where we left off,

Duster failed to realize that History, politics, and geography plays important role in creation various religions and how each is connected each other.

Even In Judaism, it originally started out as a polytheistic religion with multiple gods and goddess as well. Just like all the other ancient religions of the time. Somewhere along the way the combined all the traits of various gods and goddesses to form what we have called YAHWEH.
First, I know that with lost of evidence and such, historians and others think they know how religion was made. But they really have no real proof as to how it was made. They can come up with theoires based on evidence, but I'm sorry, that's all you got. Unless someone back then wrote down "This is why I made this religion, I made it up!" then you can't say they did, and actually, the kind of things they did write down were "God informed me of these things, so I made this religion!" So until you find that kind of real proof, we can certainly believe what they say, that God always was this monodeity with all his powers and words and deeds and the stories of the Bible all came from him or recordings of real events they heard, passed down, albeit perhaps with some mistakes or changes of the men who wrote it, but the important truth and what is needed to be in there, is.
Heartless wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:I have explained over and over how the Bible is different from Greek myths. If you and others here don't get it because you are choosing to not to or whatever reason, fine. The only thing left after that is people believe in the Bible but not Greek and Roman myth. There's something more realistic and believable about what the Bible says. And someone surviving getting eaten by a whale does sound more believable to me than a Greek tale about someone cutting off a sea monsters head to turn people to gold or something. If you don't understand the difference then fine, but I bet you really could if you wouldn't be so mad at me and not caring to even try to get what I mean.
I think I've tackled this already. Greek and Roman myth NOW is completely unrealistic, and thusly people have ceased to believe in it. Of course, back in ancient times, there was no reason not to believe in it. It made sense to people back then. It offered answers to the questions they had. And all that time, no body knew it was made up. Yet they believed it without doubt.

The same reasoning can be applied to Christianity. Christianity today can be compared to Greek mythology in ancient times. Although right now, in the present, you can say that Christianity has surpassed all other religions because people still believe it today. However, maybe in a hundred years (anytime in the future really), we will have concrete proof that Christianity was made up just like Greek mythology. The only reason why Christianity has survived is because it provided answers to questions that could not be answered at the time of the religion's creation. It's probably been so successful because most of the 'answers' it offers are ones that are impossible to answer in today's world. Perhaps one day we will be able to finally answer those questions logically, and everyone will look back in history and laugh at how silly Christianity was (just like how today we laugh at how silly Greek mythology was).
Heartless wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:If the Bible told me something and scientists told me the opposite, it would depend and I would go with my own mind and heart. Because even scientists are only using theories and such. I want to decide myself, but if you want to know where I would lean, I probably would purposely decide to lean towards trust in the Bible over what the scientists say, to go with my heart more than mere physical observations. And you and others will probably think that's silly for various logical reasons, but that's you.


There are many instances in life when the line between logic and belief (or, as you say "mind vs. heart") is unclear.. and I'm not talking about religion necessarily, I'm talking about ALL aspects of life. I believe that you cannot be blinded by either logic of belief in such a way that you are not looking at the full picture. In other words, you need to carefully look at all sides of the spectrum. Look at all possibilities and measure them with both logic and belief. I'm really not addressing you personally here, this is just a general belief of mine.
Heartless wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:God loving humans isn't choosing good or evil...though I guess anyone in the world could agree love is good, and since anyone, "bad" or "good" can agree on love, in a way it's neutral...


Something irked me about this statement.. I guess I just don't like when people say "anyone can agree that ________". Because I know for a fact all people don't believe that. The same can be applied to your statement here about love.

I think Goliath and Super Aurora have done a superb job addressing you. You continue to say that we 'just don't get what you mean.' I am confident that we understand your opinions.. perhaps you should try to look at our views in a not-so-myopic view.
Heartless, people are comparing Greek mythology to Christianity, but I already explained time and again how they are different, and tried to explain why people actually believe in the more realistic and believable Christianity. Pretty much everyone here has chosen not to see, understand, or believe it, and so, that's all you. I'm pretty sure all people anywhere can agree love is good and want love, but if you find somone who truly, really doesn't, then I guess I will have been wrong. And I try to, and am sure I do, understand all of you. I don't think however that you all are understanding me, because usually I will point out specific things like differences between things like Christianity and Mythology, and you all, basically, say "no, they are all the same" without really saying why or talking specifically about my points. You often even say you can't understand what I mean by "more believable impossible things". If you say you can't understand it, but I say I can understand you, then there we go. The only thing I can't understand is why you nonbelievers all really want to say or believe what you all do, but factors like your life experiences, simple lack of believing, fear of not being as smart as you can (of which you may think adherence to logic or science is the only way to be smart), or wanting to do whatever you want on Earth certainly are factors I could understand, so even then, I do.
Dr Frankenollie wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:Dr Frankenollie, but it is more amazing for everyone to have a choice, a power, to be able to decide to be good or evil, than for God to make everyone be happy. I mean in a way it makes us like God, having choice. And God maybe didn't have to give us a choice but just wanted to because it's great. If you don't think it's great, well that's your negative opinion.
Duster...I know that it's wonderful to have a choice, but God didn't have to make it possible for us to be evil; he could have allowed us to be good or somewhat flawed, but why would he allow us to become completely evil? If God is real, then the fact that he allows us to make even the most despicable of choices (like Hitler's choices, for example) is appalling, as such evil has led to extreme pain and suffering.


Dr Frankenollie wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:Like enigmawing beautifully said, (and thank you so much enigmawing, that was GREAT and very well said!), it is through pain and suffering that we can better see our true character. The reason we apologize for sinning is because God knows what we do not, what you do not, and often we sin because we choose badly in a world that has some pain and suffering.

Yes, our true character can be seen via pain and suffering, but some suffer much more than others, so the theory of a 'test' justifying evil still doesn't make sense. As a sidenote, if pain and suffering is a test, then why do Christians try and end it? Why do religious people donate to scientific centres developing a cure for cancer if cancer is just a test to see both the sufferer and their family's true character? Why don't Christians just let innocent children going through miserable pain and agony die if it's part of a test? If life is a test, then it's clear that trying to stop pain and suffering is wrecking God's test; gee, does that mean that all the scientists in the history of the world who found cures for various diseases and illnesses are now in Hell because they ruined God's plans?

Furthermore, Duster, life can't be a test because it would mean that there's no free will. If Bin Laden existed to test the victims of 9/11, then he couldn't have complete free will.

Dr Frankenollie wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:And you keep saying we have the worst world ever, but that is merely an opinion of yours and others. Not everyone agrees the world is a terrible place, whether it's bad or not will always be opinion. Since just as many people can see the world is good, why not take the more positive route like them?
Duster, seeing the world as a nice place is being ridiculously optimistic. People die all the time not just due to age when it's natural and time for them to pass away, but because of crime, because of suffering, and because of humanity's immense amounts of greed, stupidity and selfishness. I will not see life as more happy than sad until, at the very least, there is total peace, which wll unequivocally not be achieved in my lifetime.
Dr Frankenollie wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:As for Heaven, if you were the kind of person who would be ready for Heaven when the time came, you would be the kind of person who could be happy in it. Heaven is ctually something grander than the world or anything you can imagine, and you are using logic of your biological human body on Earth to say you think you wouldn't like heaven, which is something impossible for your very mind to imagine or understand all of. Generally, I think you can understand that in heaven, most likely a feeling would overcome you that you felt happy forever and didn't worry about anything, not even the fact that you were to be in heaven forever. You just wouldn't want anything else. Yes, you worry on Earth now, but this ain't heaven. You just have no idea what exactly it will be like.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/guXCIlsaHh8
Dr Frankenollie wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:The one was about religious people stopping illnesses or I guess any suffering in the world, because it's a test? Well, it easily makes sense that's part of the test! If bad is happening, do you let it happen, or do you try to stop it to save other people even if it isn't happening to you?
...That doesn't make any sense, because you said in the religious thread that things like disease exist because it's a test; how the sufferer (as well as their family and friends) deals with the test, e.g. if their faith in God is shaken or not. Whether somebody else tries to stop the disease or not can't work because that's interfering with another person's test.

That's like a teacher handing out a different test paper to everyone in the class; somebody gets a really difficult one (even though that is unfair because, like I've been saying over and over again, for a test to be fair and for its results to matter it has to be the same), yet somebody else gives them the answers and they cheat the test. Does that mean that the person who helped them cheat the test has passed his own test? Because if it does, then that makes no sense whatsoever.

In case you don't realise, this is an analogy, with the person who has the difficult test being a substitute for the disease sufferer and the person who helps them cheat their test being a disease curer. And don't get the wrong idea and start to think that I believe curing disease is bad because I compared it cheating; I'm just proving that if getting a disease is a test, then a cure is a cheat.
Dr Frankenollie wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:As for people that cause evil and that is seen as a test, ultimately that is people's true free wills doing what they will. The only part of "the test" it is is that they have the God-given ability to do evil things. I know you don't think that's good or fair or whatever, but to have the option to do evil, and to choose not to, is a powerful thing indeed.
Yeah, it is powerful: powerful enough to result in the deaths of millions, perhaps even billions. You can't deny that God not only allowed evil but also created it, and as there are so many evil people in the world, then he must have implanted a rather strong desire in all of us to be what we consider to be evil. I realise that we'll never agree on this, but to me, if 'God' did this, then he's not as all-loving as you believe.
Dr Frankenollie wrote:
Disney Duster wrote:As for the "is the after-life feasible" thing, well we aren't our physical senses. Our senses allow our brains, and yes, also our souls, to know things. We aren't our senses, but our souls use our brains and senses to know things outside of ourselve. It is more our thoughts, feelings, views, opinions, and decisions, that are made about/using the information we get from senses, that show who we are, and what our soul that lives on is. The soul is a non-physical idea, so any talk of physical senses doesn't apply. Besides, the concept of what "we" are is also subjective and debatable!
But there is no scientific proof of the existence of a soul or its residence within the human body...and thus this is a kind of copout. I gather that you mean that the soul works with the brain and gathers the same kind of information and also makes decisions; yet it can't make a lot of the decisions, seeing as scientists would have discovered that not all choices are made by the brain in this scenario. (I'm not 100% sure about that however, but I'm quite sure nonetheless).
When people say that bad things are a test, we only say that as the closest kind of thing to what it is. But it is not the kind of test that can be analagied in every detail. Anyway it doesn't matter, because once someone has a disease, they are already recieving the test of having something bad happen to them, and deciding whether they will still be a good person, believe in God, believe could pray about it, et cetera et cetera, before any curing happens.

I would be okay with the idea God created evil, but I think what happened is he created all good, but allowed things to be evil of their own accord. In other words, he gave humans great power, almost God-like power, to create very bad evil. It's pretty terrifying but also pretty amazing. And remember, a lot of "evil" comes from desires for things that are usually good things, but we may make evil choices that hurt other people to get them. That is how we ourselves create evil.

Well, yea, there's no proof of a soul other than our own feelings and belief in it. You can either think what you're feeling inside you is one or not, or ignore it. If scientists say the brain is making choices, that would only be like saying a machine controlled by a human makes choices. The actual person is making the choice, and yet they would be saying the machine is the chooser. In other words, the soul makes the choices but uses the brain to do so. You can choose to believe it or not, but I don't know why you'd want to believe all you are is some physical machine-like thing.

A friend of mine actually told me scientists do not know what makes choices, but even if scientists said they did, so before you thought you had control but now you actually think you're just some slave to a machin/puppet-like thing making choices, I wouldn't believe it. No matter how much evidence they had. If that being able to not believe boggles your mind, oh well, but you could choose to believe or not, too. That would be yet another choice. Of the will. Of the soul. Free will and all that.

Whew, what a lot to look at! But it is really more for everyone to see where we left off and me and Dr Frankenollie's conversation after that, and for him to respond to the last, un-quoted part.
Image
User avatar
Goliath
Diamond Edition
Posts: 4749
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:35 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Goliath »

Because I don't want to repeat myself with the usual George Carlin stuff, here's another great piece on religion. And if the people in this thread who are religious are serious about the issues adressed in this thread, I'd like to read their replies after having seen this little bit. The topics covered include: the HARM that religion has done and is still doing on a daily basis; and the really irrational basis of religion --when you think about it.

Everybody else: just enjoy.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/HyHhAoxTXKI" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Lazario
Suspended
Posts: 8296
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:35 am
Location: Shock and Awe Gender: Freakazoid

Post by Lazario »

Disney Duster wrote:Sounds like so many of you left rleligion just because you had bad experiences with people using the religion wrongly around you...
Sorry, Dusty, there's no way around it: Religion is meant to be kept private. When it learns how to stop demonizing people for stupid reasons and to stop promoting angry, violent, intolerant views, then you'll get more people agreeing that religion ain't so bad.
Image
4 Disney Atmosphere Images
PixarFan2006
Signature Collection
Posts: 6166
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:44 am
Location: Michigan

Post by PixarFan2006 »

I am pretty sure I am a Christian. I am not an atheist, I know that for a fact. I have not been to church in more then ten years (last time I went was when my grandmother was alive and was living up north), but it seems to me that a lot of people who go to church have the same attitude (maybe not all[/] people.

I think that Religion is one of the biggest problems with our world today. It gets in the way of issues that could potentially benefit all of us. I agree with Lazario about everything he said about freedom. I believe that all women should have the right to have abortions if they choose (especially if it was forced on her through rape), and homosexuals should every right to marry (they are not hurting anybody doing this).

The problem with this is that someone is always going to whine and moan and protest about something, using the bible as reference. There will never be such a thing as complete freedom since people are too ignorant.
Post Reply