Well
pap64, don't be hard on yourself, if you even were. I enjoy the film for many reasons, but a lot of them have to do with childhood memories and preferred visual coolness, not by discoveries of more depth or whatever, as they don't really heighten my experience of the film, emotionally or enjoyably. Though, I'm also not the most emotional person. But they do make me like the film more and feel it's greater.
There was some countdown of greatest animated films that called Cinderella deceptfully simple. It would be nice to think the film is really greater than most critics think because of some subtle stuff they never caught.
Thanks for the quote
Flam-Ham, though I've read reviews of the film after the authors just saw it that sound like they still thought it was unimpressive. Whatevs!
Disney's Divinity, well, this is not the thread to go comparing all the depth we find in all the films, and depth is subjective anyway, but I will say I feel the subtle depths in this film trump the "depths" the other films have. It would be nice to know all the depths you think they have in some thread. Glad you didn't include Aladdin, though if you read Film Freak's review you may change your mind.
Thanks
MagicMirror for your thoughts on this film.
Tsom said while watching the movie on a big screen in a classroom, the larger stepmother was even scarier, especially in close-ups.
I, too, wish occasionally that they kept particular scenes closer to the Mary Blair concepts that inspired them, but for the most part I like what they did over Mary's initial designs, though perhaps it's hard for me to seperate the essence of it from the way she drew it.
MagicMirror wrote:
The studio instead made it a bit too live-action-y for my tastes in some parts.
I think I recognized that, and I think Cinderella's the most realistic, or perhaps as you said, live-action-y, of the Disney fairy tales, at least in designs. I've thought of, and like to use, the term "industrial" when thinking of Cinderella's world. Maybe that's not the right word...?
MagicMirror wrote:
In terms of a score, I'm not sure whether to give it a 7/10 or an 8/10, so I'll settle for 7.5/10.
Wah. Well, that's a lot like most other people's scores, it seems. Even though I currently see what seem to be a few imperfections, I would rate the film 10/10, because even masterpieces aren't perfect, and there's no such thing as a perfect film, at least a perfect film that's perfect for everyone. Though if the film should be perfect
to me, I don't feel it is right now, but I can't think of any film that I loved every part of. Maybe there is, I dunno. Maybe I need a film all about Disney dust. LOL.