The wardrobe made that gown out of the materials she had in her and that was the wardrobe, not the castle itself. I think we'll just have to agree to disagree no this.Disney Duster wrote:But the wardrobe makes her the first new gown she wears there. She makes it for her. So she could have made her other dresses, too.JeanGreyForever wrote:As I said, I always thought the magic decorations to her dress was rubbish and clearly a cheap attempt to recreate the Cinderella transformation moment. They likely felt it might try and make Belle's dress more appealing after all the flack it got online but it didn't work. There's nothing else in the live-action or animated film that suggests magic created her dresses. This isn't a case of Cinderella or Aurora or even Ariel who had magic dresses thanks to a wand or trident. Even Jasmine had magic clothes in the form of her red slave outfit with Jafar's staff.
I thought the gold decorations going on to her dress was part of the castle being alive?JeanGreyForever wrote:I don't consider the castle living though unlike its cursed inhabitants within its interior. Oh yes, I forgot about the double-headed eagle symbol so they must have existed in Europe although that makes me wonder why they are considered such an American symbol then.
Wow! I would have loved that! But I liked Gerard Butler as the Phantom.JeanGreyForever wrote:Anne Hathaway I heard was also the original choice for Christine in The Phantom of the Opera movie alongside Hugh Jackman as the Phantom. Not sure why they weren't cast in the end.
That would imply the film had a sense of continuity or logic but the scene was just thrown in as a "crowd-pleasing" moment much like the enchanted book and the backstory of Belle's mother was intertwined even if it makes no sense why Belle doesn't use that book to reach her father at the end.
I liked the cast we ended up with but I would have liked the original choices as well.