Avaitor wrote:k.
I didn't mean you had to erase them (But I
really appreciate it- I was actually thinking about this before I fell asleep last night)
They were bunching up. If you had put in more spaces between instead, they would have stacked underneath each other.
Goliath wrote:Lazario: It's strange, but the pictures in your first post on this page (page 3) don't show, and your re-arranged collage from The Rescuers also doesn't show. All other pictures you posted, I can see. I also can see all pictures of other members. Only those two I mentioned don't show. Am I the only one who can't see them?
EDIT: Never mind, Laz! I now see where those pictures went: 30 miles to the east! For some weird reason, they ended up waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay on the right!
Aviator fixed that. The page should be back to normal now. (YAY for asking people for things!)
So- does this still take you forever to do? After the extra steps I gave you to help?
Disney Duster wrote:So you must be conscious of the aspect ratio, and so you must simply take away as much as you do from the with as you do from the height, and you are fine?
Different movies are different sizes. So when you make them smaller, you don't want them all the same size because the characters in the shot will look stretched or squished. Like:
<img src="
http://magicalscreencaps.com/images/lad ... amp644.jpg" width="400" height="225" border="0">
That's the pic at 400-width, 225-height. Now, change the width to 300, and:
<img src="
http://magicalscreencaps.com/images/lad ... amp644.jpg" width="300" height="225" border="0">
Looks
much more natural. That's an example of stretching. Now, let's see some squishing:
<img src="
http://magicalscreencaps.com/images/ala ... din429.jpg" width="300" height="225" border="0">
At 300-width, 225-height.
<img src="
http://magicalscreencaps.com/images/ala ... din429.jpg" width="400" height="225" border="0">
^ at 400-width, 225-height. The wider one is better for Aladdin. The skinnier one is better for Lady and the Tramp.
The way to figure out what size to use:
A. If they have bars on the sides, they're 400-width, 225-height.
B. If they have almost no bars at all, they're 300-width, 225-height.
C. If they have bars on the top and bottom, they're 350-width, 200-height.
(Movies that
should have bars on the sides: The Jungle Book, Oliver & Company, The Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, probably everything after that)
(Movies that
should have no bars at all: Snow White, Pinocchio, Dumbo, Bambi, Cinderella, Alice in Wonderland, Peter Pan, Lady and the Tramp, 101 Dalmatians, Sword in the Stone, The Aristocats, Robin Hood, and Fox and the Hound)
(I just realized that Sleeping Beauty is a freak- The Black Cauldron, the other super-wide film, has bars on the sides too. So that means it will be at a different size than Sleeping Beauty. It seems to look best at 300-width, 225-height, like all the fullscreen pics:
<img src="
http://magicalscreencaps.com/images/the ... ron033.jpg" width="300" height="225" border="0">
Huh...)
A lot of pics at Magical Screencaps do not look good. They're stretched and like, pixelated to hell. Beauty and the Beast and Sleeping Beauty in particular, look terrible. Pinocchio also. But making them smaller makes it harder to see what's wrong with those pictures anyway.
But also- resizing them just makes the page look better. If you want to recall the brilliance of a whole scene's animation (like with the clouds, rainbows, colors, backgrounds, etc.), you can stick a chunk of pictures if you make them smaller.