Disney Duster wrote:
The "Frog" part does NOT have gold sparkles. Those are little bumps that...a frog has. That part of the title is green and bumpy like a frog.
I never said golden
sparkles, I said sparkles. And really I was referring to a post by ajmrowland, which said that it looked better with the "sparkles" (it was a slight jab... Being on this site has made me so cynical, not that I don't love it). In fact, to me, I don't see bumps or sparkles, but algae off a pond. I can't really say for sure what it is, the Title is so small, but I don't think you can either.
Anyway, on to Tiana's facial expressions. I have wild expressions, I'm a very quiet person, so I use the my face to say what I mean a lot of the time. It certainly a part of my personality, maybe of Tiana's too, and I think people just look more interesting if they use their face properly.
The quality of the animation- It's from YouTube and taped from a TV, so it's low quality and it's lovely. ALSO, it's very important that no one judges this film to early. As Disney's Divinity said, it's really getting to parallel of AB in here.
So Cindy 3 came out and we all adored it so that set the bar high for AB, and since it was about a Disney Princess, the boards were cluttered with it. And so we begin to over-analyze, people pick sides, fights spark out, yada yada yada, and it ruins the movie for some people.
That's the last thing we want to happen with the first 2-D animated movie. Not that we can't share our opinions, but for a just cause. I don't think that the limited amount of footage we've seen (one teaser trailer and this TV show) is enough to make it a full-blown classic, or a piece of utter garbage. We just have to wait.
Really, this thread gets more ridiculous with every little piece of information.
Avatar and signature are Al Hirschfeld illustrations of Julie Andrews in Star!