Thank you for the updates DisneyVillian!!!
ichabod wrote:
Is it wrong that the trailer actually excited me!
I have to say that In my eyes this is far preferable to making sequels and if Disney want to make these short tales with classic characters, it is not as bad as making as sequel and therefore will have less of a damaging effect upon the brand if sub par.
Don't be ashamed, I was excited too! But I definitely agree, ichabod. Especially with the "package" sequels, this format is much better (and probably will be met with much more enthusiasm and acceptance) for continuing stories of classic characters. I just hope that doesn't give them the idea to reuse the Cinderella and Belle stories....hmmm, will they use the Atlantis stories? I haven't seen the sequel yet, but are there any stories in which Kida has a significant role. She is afterall a true royal and deserves to be a Disney Princess.
Anyhow, the trailer was nice, but for some reason, it was choppy and was like looking at a series of screencaps. The audio worked fine though. I could tell that Tress MacNeille (Daisy Duck, Mrs. Pickles, Dot, and a whole bunch of others) was Merryweather and Russi Taylor (Minnie Mouse) was Fauna. Aurora sounded a lot like Jennifer Hale (Cinderella in the sequel), though I wish they looked for a closer match to Mary Costa. All in all, though the storyline sounds quite familiar, lol, this new short and format seems very promising.
The only thing that irks me was the overuse of "little girls." Yes, I am a male college freshman, but we remember and love the Disney princesses too.

_________________
<a href=http://kramnebuer.dvdaf.com/>My ºoº DVDs </a>