If you could send me a link or source where you read that Glen Keane hand drew over the CGI I'd be interested in reading that (just out of shear curiosity).Disney Duster wrote:If YOU didn't notice how Tangled looks more like a Disney hand-drawn film than previous efforts, A LOT of other people DID. We know for a FACT they didn't give up on it when for instance Glen Keane HAND-DREW over the CGI animation and taught them hand-drawn principles all during the animating.
And just because he supposedly was teaching them hand-drawn techniques to incorporate into the computer animation process does not mean that it made the entire film look more like a hand-drawn film...
In my opinion, the movie's sharp details (in hair, textures, etc.) and lighting made it stand away from looking like a hand-drawn feature.. In some cases, the environments/textures looked almost real. Compare this to any hand-drawn film and it will be vastly different.
But to say it looked more hand-drawn than past CG movies... what exactly are you meaning by this. Could you point out some details where Tangled shows more traces of having this trait more-so than, say, Bolt? CG has already advanced since Meet the Robinsons/Chicken Little and I can see obvious differences there.. but what makes it more "hand-drawn looking" than those films..