Let's try this again.
Floyd Norman
is able to have his own opinions not having to do with anyone else. We all agree on this.
However, this time, he was talking about what should be done for a company that is not
his, it is
Walt Disney's. Since he worked for Walt and liked Walt, he would not want to do anything that went
against Walt's approval. It is true we do not know for 100% sure if he actually would purposely do something against what he thought Walt would approve of, but it is very, very, very, very, very, very, very likely that he would only do something that he thinks Walt would approve
that had to do with Walt's own company. And notice I did not say he thinks exactly like Walt, just that because he knew Walt, he is more likely than even the people that made Tangled to have an idea of what Walt would want.
And yes, I did fight for the title of Tangled. I signed robster's petition and spoke my mind as much as I good. I even protested the title. If you don't consider what Floyd Norman did fighting, fine, but I do, because speaking your opinion, especially in a news article many people will see, to try and get something changed is still a small amount of fighting. Not much, but it's still an attempt.
SWillie! wrote:This, right here, is definition of "Disney Duster." You always adjust your argument so that it works around the legitimate flaws in your logic that other people point out.
This one cannot be said to be opinion. Only I, the person you are talking about, can tell you what the true me is, what is truly going on in my mind, and I tell you that though I adjusted my argument there, in other times that you think I adjusted my argument, I did not. Sometimes people have to re-explain things in different ways to get across
the very same argument they always meant. If you don't believe that ever happens well tough luck but it either has happened to you yourself already or it will someday.