DVDizzy Forum

Sorry for bumping this thread, but there are many to put on this list. The Aristocats . For being pure, breezy fun. The Rescuers Down Under . I always thought it was unfair that it was neglected at the expense of it`s Renaissance counterparts, cause it is a good movie. With great cinematography, a t...

DEEcat98 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:14 amHow about for the spin-offs?

Well, truth to be told, I haven`t seen so many complains about them, really. But that`s just me, though. I could be wrong.

Being done in a vector "almost there" / Rapunzel style is about the most I was expecting anyway. While they probably want some aspects of the movie in the style, the more practical/realistic part me knew expecting real hand drawn was a pipe dream. They're gonna do what they're gonna do, w...

friendoftheotherside wrote: ↑Tue Apr 16, 2024 9:08 amI got friends on the other side

Pun intened

I’ve heard that Moana would have a sister in the series. So that girl in the first picture could be her. If I’m not mistaken, her name was Sima or something like that. So I’ve learned some new information about Moana 2 and I want to correct something. Yes, Moana will have a sister in the sequel, bu...

Cinderella 3 and Jungle Book 2 did it, but I think their recap was likable and a good way to get into the movie, Agreed. And Peter Pan: Return to NeverLand somewhat did it as well in it`s prologue. Despite not being a direct recap, it was summarizing it`s characters and situations. the only problem...

Thanks for sharing, D23ExpoVisitor25 . But she still looks a little plumb, lol

Disney Duster wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2024 10:29 pmNo one hates you!

Aaaaw, thank you

Well, the truth is that people in general have always complained about some aspects about Disney. And even before 2018. That`s mostly how the world works, as people not only have a tendency to complain, but to forget that there were always aspects of the past to rant about. But each period has their...

Because it’s my favourite out of all the Walt Disney feature animated movies :-) my mom and I love this movie, and I’ve always loved dinosaurs, as well as obviously the aforementioned land before time, and the story and morality is so good, and it’s just a world that along with a bugs life I would ...

I never thought about the show having Tarzan go to England. But I think something like that would need to be a multiepisode arc and maybe they didnt want to devote all that time to a new setting. Most ppl watching the show would be little boys who want to see the jungle fights and stuff. I would ha...

D23ExpoVisitor25 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 6:22 pmRalph Breaks The Internet used “2” not in Roman numeral when “Wreck-It Ralph 2” was added as the sequel’s subtitle

True, but Ralph Breaks the Internet still wasn`t classic Disney as Frozen and Moana, if you know what I mean.

She's legal now and 3 years older than how we last saw her in the first movie. That's why she looks different. So the sequel is basically following the synergy of Frozen II , huh? Frozen II took place three years after it`s predecessor and Moana 2 will essentially do the same. But Moana looks way o...

Disney’s Dinosaur 2, Along with many other sequels (According to a Jim Hill article I read almost 20 years ago, Disney did plan on having Dinosaur Be their own Land before time, Which they still should do to capitalize on that as well as the Jurassic movies, EH? But apparently it’s because it unfor...

Sorry for bumping this thread, but I wanted to give my thoughts about this issue. While it would be safe to say that the Revival era is over, it`s remarkable how Disney haven`t really changed the formula from the Revival era. With the exception of a few tweaks, most of their post-Revival features do...

Pocahontas II. Mainly because Pocahontas needed a sequel to show what happened afterwards, for it`s unhappy ending.

Kyle wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 12:59 pm Man, that's not emotion. it's the same "expression" we saw in the entire first remake.

Exactly! They look just as naturalistic as they did in the remake.

Hi DisneyFan09, I agree with you about some what. Cinderella III did give her more screen time and a more active role in the story, and Return to Never Land managed to go through the story without mentioning the Native Americans. The other cheapquels didn't try to fix any mistakes per se, only to e...

Wow, she certainly looks older and a little more plumb. But it was still a lovely picture

Sotiris wrote: ↑Wed Apr 03, 2024 12:58 pmIs it me or does she look off? I think it's the hair?

No, it`s not just you. She does look a little off. Perhaps due to the weight on her and her posture.

I'm sorry but I don't agree. I've never been offended by the sequels the way I've been offended by basically all the remakes including the ones I've never watched! :cry: Fair enough. Pocahontas 2 is the only one that I think was made because of criticms about historical accuracy but it only makes s...